sudoku times help puzzle sudoku quest sudoku book puzzle sudoku line sudoku code sudoku

There is no doubt that it was not until the British Daily Telegraph introduced the puzzle on a daily basis on 23 February 2005 with the full front-page treatment advertising the fact, that the other UK national newspapers began to take real interest. The Telegraph continued to splash the puzzle on its front page, realizing that it was gaining sales simply by its presence. Until then the Times had kept very quiet about the huge daily interest that its daily Sudoku competition had aroused. That newspaper already had plans for taking advantage of their market lead, and a first Sudoku book was already on the stocks before any other national UK papers had realised just how popular Sudoku might be. Here are some of the more notable single-instance variations: Other Japanese publishers refer to the puzzle as Number Place, the original U.S. title, or as "Nanpure" for short. Some non-Japanese publishers spell the title as "su doku". In the "what-if" approach, a cell with only two candidate numerals is selected, and a guess is made. The steps above are repeated unless a duplication is found or a cell is left with no possible candidate, in which case the alternative candidate is the solution. In logical terms, this is known as reductio ad absurdum. Nishio is a limited form of this approach: for each candidate for a cell, the question is posed: will entering a particular numeral prevent completion of the other placements of that numeral? If the answer is yes, then that candidate can be eliminated. The what-if approach requires a pencil and eraser. This approach may be frowned on by logical purists as trial and error (and most published puzzles are built to ensure that it will never be necessary to resort to this tactic) but it can arrive at solutions fairly rapidly. Nikoli Sudoku are hand-constructed, with the author being credited; the givens are always found in a symmetrical pattern. Dell Number Place Challenger (see Variants below) puzzles also list authors. The Sudoku puzzles printed in most UK newspapers are apparently computer-generated but employ symmetrical givens; The Guardian licenses and publishes Nikoli-constructed Sudoku puzzles, though it does not include credits. The Guardian famously claimed that because they were hand-constructed, their puzzles would contain "imperceptible witticisms" that would be very unlikely in computer-generated Sudoku. The challenge to Sudoku programmers is teaching a program how to build clever puzzles, such that they may be indistinguishable from those constructed by humans; Wayne Gould required six years of tweaking his popular program before he believed he achieved that level. A three-dimensional Sudoku puzzle was invented by Dion Church and published in the Daily Telegraph in May 2005. Another alternative uses finite domain constraint programming. A constraint program specifies the constraints of the puzzle (the fact that every number in each row, each column, and each 3×3 region must be unique, and the provided "givens"); a finite domain solver applies the constraints successively to narrow down the solution space until a solution is found. Backtracking may be applied when alternate values cannot otherwise be excluded.

Another common variant is for additional restrictions to be enforced on the placement of numbers beyond the usual row, column, and region requirements. Often the restriction takes the form of an extra "dimension"; the most common is for the numbers in the main diagonals of the grid to also be required to be unique. The aforementioned Number Place Challenger puzzles are all of this variant, as are the Sudoku X puzzles in the Daily Mail, which use 6×6 grids. The Daily Mail also features Super Sudoku X in its Weekend magazine: an 8×8 grid in which rows, columns, main diagonals, 2×4 blocks and 4×2 blocks contain each number once. Another dimension in use is digits with the same relative location within their respective regions; such puzzles are usually printed in colour, with each disjoint group sharing one colour for clarity. Also found is the Circular Sudoku, also known as Target Sudoku, invented by Essex mathematician Peter Higgins. [3] [4] In this variant, all the numbers must appear in all the concentric rings as well as in all pairs of adjacent wedges. Puzzles constructed from multiple Sudoku grids are common. Five 9×9 grids which overlap at the corner regions in the shape of a quincunx is known in Japan as Gattai 5 (five merged) Sudoku. In The Times and The Sydney Morning Herald this form of puzzle is known as Samurai SuDoku. [6] Puzzles with twenty or more overlapping grids are not uncommon in some Japanese publications. Often, no givens are to be found in overlapping regions. Sequential grids, as opposed to overlapping, are also published, with values in specific locations in grids needing to be transferred to others. Alphabetical variations have also emerged; there is no functional difference in the puzzle unless the letters spell something. Some variants, such as in the TV Guide, include a word reading along a main diagonal, row, or column once solved; determining the word in advance can be viewed as a solving aid. The Code Doku [7] devised by Steve Schaefer has an entire sentence embedded into the puzzle; the Super Wordoku [8] from Top Notch embeds two 9-letter words, one on each diagonal. It is debatable whether these are true Sudoku puzzles: although they purportedly have a single linguistically valid solution, they cannot necessarily be solved entirely by logic, requiring the solver to determine the embedded words. Top Notch claim this as a feature designed to defeat solving programs. The maximum number of givens that can be provided while still not rendering the solution unique is four short of a full grid; if two instances of two numbers each are missing and the cells they are to occupy form the corners of an orthogonal rectangle, and exactly two of these cells are within one region, there are two ways the numbers can be assigned. Since this applies to Latin squares in general, most variants of Sudoku have the same maximum. The inverse problem—the fewest givens that render a solution unique—is unsolved, although the lowest number yet found for the standard variation without a symmetry constraint is 17, a number of which have been found by Japanese puzzle enthusiasts [12] [13], and 18 with the givens in rotationally symmetric cells. Counting 1-9 in regions, rows, and columns to identify missing numerals. Counting based upon the last numeral discovered may speed up the search. It also can be the case (typically in tougher puzzles) that the easiest way to ascertain the value of an individual cell is by counting in reverse—that is, by scanning the cell's region, row, and column for values it cannot be, in order to see which is left. In 1997, retired Hong Kong judge Wayne Gould, 59, a New Zealander, saw a partly completed puzzle in a Japanese bookshop. Over 6 years he developed a computer program to produce puzzles quickly. Knowing that British newspapers have a long history of publishing crosswords and other puzzles, he promoted Sudoku to The Times in Britain, which launched it on 12 November 2004 (calling it su doku). The puzzles by Pappocom, Gould's software house, have been printed daily in the Times ever since. Advanced solvers look for "contingencies" while scanning that is, narrowing a numeral's location within a row, column, or region to two or three cells. When those cells all lie within the same row (or column) and region, they can be used for elimination purposes during cross-hatching and counting (Contingency example at Puzzle Japan). Particularly challenging puzzles may require multiple contingencies to be recognized, perhaps in multiple directions or even intersecting—relegating most solvers to marking up (as described below). Puzzles which can be solved by scanning alone without requiring the detection of contingencies are classified as "easy" puzzles; more difficult puzzles, by definition, cannot be solved by basic scanning alone.

Sudoku puzzle game and solver by MuddyFunksters

Every puzzle has just one correct solution. The puzzle is most frequently a 9×9 grid, made up of 3×3 subgrids called "regions" (other terms include "boxes", "blocks", and the like when referring to the standard variation; even "quadrants" is sometimes used, despite this being an inaccurate term for a 9×9 grid). In Japanese, the word is pronounced [s??dok?]; in English, it is usually spoken with an Anglicised pronunciation, [s?'d??ku?] (BrE) [s?'do?ku?] (AmE) or ['su?d??ku] (BrE) ['su?do?ku] (AmE) (See IPA, International Phonetic Alphabet for notation usage.) Wei-Hwa Huang created a meta-Sudoku, where the object is to finish drawing the 5×5 grid's pentomino-region borders so as to leave a uniquely solvable puzzle with no identically-shaped regions. Each numeral in the solution therefore occurs only once in each of three "directions" or "scopes", hence the "single numbers" implied by the puzzle's name. Although the 9×9 grid with 3×3 regions is by far the most common, numerous variations abound: sample puzzles can be 4×4 grids with 2×2 regions; 5×5 grids with pentomino regions have been published under the name Logi-5; the World Puzzle Championship has previously featured a 6×6 grid with 2×3 regions and a 7×7 grid with six heptomino regions and a disjoint region; Daily SuDoku features new 4×4, 6×6, and simpler 9×9 grids every day as Daily SuDoku for Kids. [1] Even the 9×9 grid is not always standard, with Ebb regularly publishing some of those with nonomino regions (also known as a jigsaw variation); the 2005 U.S. Puzzle Championship had a Sudoku with parallelogram regions that wrapped around the outer border of the puzzle, as if the grid were toroidal. Larger grids are also possible, with Daily SuDoku's 12×12-grid Monster SuDoku [2], the Times likewise offers a 12×12-grid Dodeka sudoku with 12 regions each being 4×3, Dell regularly publishing 16×16 Number Place Challenger puzzles (the 16×16 variant often uses 1 through G rather than the 0 through F used in hexadecimal), and Nikoli proffering 25×25 Sudoku the Giant behemoths. In "candidate elimination", progress is made by successively eliminating candidate numerals from one or more cells to leave just one choice. After each answer has been achieved, another scan may be performed—usually checking to see the effect of the contingencies. Published puzzles often are ranked in terms of difficulty. Surprisingly, the number of givens has little or no bearing on a puzzle's difficulty. A puzzle with a minimum number of givens may be very easy to solve, and a puzzle with more than the average number of givens can still be extremely difficult to solve. The difficulty of a puzzle is based on the relevance and the positioning of the given numbers rather than the quantity of the numbers.

It is also fairly simple to build a backtracking search. Typically this involves assigning a value (say, 1, or the nearest available number to 1) to the first available cell (say, the top left hand corner) and then moves on to assign the next available value (say, 2) to the next available cell. This continues until a conflict occurs, in which case the next alternative value is used for the last cell changed. If a cell cannot be filled, the program backs up one level (from that cell) and tries the next value at the higher level (hence the name backtracking). Although far from computationally efficient, this "brute force" method will find a solution, given sufficient computation time (even a fairly naive implementation will typically not take a noticeable amount of time). A more efficient program could keep track of potential values for cells, eliminating impossible values until only one value remains for a cell, then filling that cell in and using that information for more eliminations, and so on until the puzzle is solved. Nikoli Sudoku are hand-constructed, with the author being credited; the givens are always found in a symmetrical pattern. Dell Number Place Challenger (see Variants below) puzzles also list authors. The Sudoku puzzles printed in most UK newspapers are apparently computer-generated but employ symmetrical givens; The Guardian licenses and publishes Nikoli-constructed Sudoku puzzles, though it does not include credits. The Guardian famously claimed that because they were hand-constructed, their puzzles would contain "imperceptible witticisms" that would be very unlikely in computer-generated Sudoku. The challenge to Sudoku programmers is teaching a program how to build clever puzzles, such that they may be indistinguishable from those constructed by humans; Wayne Gould required six years of tweaking his popular program before he believed he achieved that level. Counting 1-9 in regions, rows, and columns to identify missing numerals. Counting based upon the last numeral discovered may speed up the search. It also can be the case (typically in tougher puzzles) that the easiest way to ascertain the value of an individual cell is by counting in reverse—that is, by scanning the cell's region, row, and column for values it cannot be, in order to see which is left. The two main approaches to analysis are "candidate elimination" and "what-if". The two main approaches to analysis are "candidate elimination" and "what-if". The United States Sudoku Association Inc. [21] is another corporation hosting tournaments across the United States. Currently, they are sponsoring a tournament for charity for the American Legion. Their website also includes a forum. United States broadcaster CBS has run several stories concerning Sudoku, including on the Early Show in summer 2005, and on the CBS Evening News that autumn, on October 26. An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. Published puzzles often are ranked in terms of difficulty. Surprisingly, the number of givens has little or no bearing on a puzzle's difficulty. A puzzle with a minimum number of givens may be very easy to solve, and a puzzle with more than the average number of givens can still be extremely difficult to solve. The difficulty of a puzzle is based on the relevance and the positioning of the given numbers rather than the quantity of the numbers.