creator sudoku palm sudoku sudoku pocket pc online play sudoku puzzle strategy sudoku help puzzle sudoku

The strategy for solving a puzzle may be regarded as comprising a combination of three processes: scanning, marking up, and analysing. The two main approaches to analysis are "candidate elimination" and "what-if". There's no math involved, the grid has numbers, but nothing has to add up to anything else. Fill in the grid so that every row, every column, and every 3x3 box contains the digits 1 through 9. By April and May 2005 the puzzle had become popular in these publications and it was rapidly introduced to several other national British newspapers including The Independent, The Guardian, The Sun (where it was labelled Sun Doku), and The Daily Mirror. As the name sudoku became well-known in Britain, the Daily Mail adopted it in place of its earlier name "Codenumber". Newspapers competed to promote their sudoku puzzles, with The Times and the Daily Mail each claiming to have been the first to feature sudoku. Cross-hatching: the scanning of rows (or columns) to identify which line in a particular region may contain a certain numeral by a process of elimination. This process is then repeated with the columns (or rows). For fastest results, the numerals are scanned in order of their frequency. It is important to perform this process systematically, checking all of the digits 1-9. The second notation uses a pattern of dots within each square, where the position of the dot represents a number from 1 to 9. Dot schemes differ and one method is illustrated here. The dot notation has the advantage that it can be used on the original puzzle. Dexterity is required in placing the dots, since misplaced dots or inadvertent marks inevitably lead to confusion and may not be easy to erase without adding to the confusion. Using a sharp pencil with an eraser end is recommended. The numerals in sudoku puzzles are used for convenience; arithmetic relationships between numerals are absolutely irrelevant. Any set of distinct symbols will do; letters, shapes, or colours may be used without altering the rules One method of candidate elimination works by identifying "matched cells". Cells are said to be matched within a particular row, column, or region (scope) if two cells contain the same pair of candidate numerals (p,q) and no others, or if three cells contain the same triplet of candidate numerals (p,q,r) and no others. The placement of these numerals anywhere else within that same scope would make a solution for the matched cells impossible; thus, the candidate numerals (p,q,r) appearing in unmatched cells in that same row, column or region (scope) can be deleted. The digits to be entered are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

Cross-hatching: the scanning of rows (or columns) to identify which line in a particular region may contain a certain numeral by a process of elimination. This process is then repeated with the columns (or rows). For fastest results, the numerals are scanned in order of their frequency. It is important to perform this process systematically, checking all of the digits 1-9. An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. The first principle is based on cells where only matched numerals appear. The second is based on numerals that appear only in matched cells. The validity of either principle is demonstrated by posing the question, 'Would entering the eliminated numeral prevent completion of the other necessary placements?' If the answer to the question is 'Yes,' then the candidate numeral in question can be eliminated. Advanced techniques carry these concepts further to include multiple rows, columns, and regions. In the subscript notation the candidate numerals are written in subscript in the cells. The drawback to this is that original puzzles printed in a newspaper usually are too small to accommodate more than a few digits of normal handwriting. If using the subscript notation, solvers often create a larger copy of the puzzle or employ a sharp or mechanical pencil. Building a sudoku puzzle by hand can be performed efficiently by pre-determining the locations of the givens and assigning them values only as needed to make deductive progress. Such an undefined given can be assumed to not hold any particular value as long as it is given a different value before construction is completed; the solver will be able to make the same deductions stemming from such assumptions, as at that point the given is very much defined as something else. This technique gives the constructor greater control over the flow of puzzle solving, leading the solver along the same path the compiler used in building the puzzle. (This technique is adaptable to composing puzzles other than sudoku as well.) Great caution is required, however, as failing to recognize where a number can be logically deduced at any point in construction—regardless of how tortuous that logic may be—can result in an unsolvable puzzle when defining a future given contradicts what has already been built. Building a sudoku with symmetrical givens is a simple matter of placing the undefined givens in a symmetrical pattern to begin with. Puzzles constructed from multiple sudoku grids are common. Five 9×9 grids which overlap at the corner regions in the shape of a quincunx is known in Japan as Gattai 5 (five merged) sudoku. In The Times and The Sydney Morning Herald this form of puzzle is known as Samurai sudoku. [6] Puzzles with twenty or more overlapping grids are not uncommon in some Japanese publications. Often, no givens are to be found in overlapping regions. Sequential grids, as opposed to overlapping, are also published, with values in specific locations in grids needing to be transferred to others. There's no math involved, the grid has numbers, but nothing has to add up to anything else. An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. The attraction of the puzzle is that the rules are simple, yet the line of reasoning required to reach the solution may be complex

sudoku puzzle game and solver by MuddyFunksters

When using marking, additional analysis can be performed. For example, if a digit appears only one time in the mark-ups written inside one region, then it is clear that the digit should be there, even if the cell has other digits marked as well. When using marking, a couple of similar rules applied in a specified order can solve any sudoku puzzle, without performing any kind of backtracking. Solving sudoku puzzles (as well as any other NP-hard problem) can be expressed as a graph colouring problem. The aim of the puzzle in its standard form is to construct a proper 9-colouring of a particular graph, given a partial 9-colouring. The graph in question has 81 vertices, one vertex for each cell of the grid. The vertices can be labelled with the ordered pairs , where x and y are integers between 1 and 9. In this case, two distinct vertices labelled by and are joined by an edge if and only if:or, or, and Advanced solvers look for "contingencies" while scanning that is, narrowing a numeral's location within a row, column, or region to two or three cells. When those cells all lie within the same row (or column) and region, they can be used for elimination purposes during cross-hatching and counting (Contingency example at Puzzle Japan). Particularly challenging puzzles may require multiple contingencies to be recognized, perhaps in multiple directions or even intersecting—relegating most solvers to marking up (as described below). Puzzles which can be solved by scanning alone without requiring the detection of contingencies are classified as "easy" puzzles; more difficult puzzles, by definition, cannot be solved by basic scanning alone. The strategy for solving a puzzle may be regarded as comprising a combination of three processes: scanning, marking up, and analysing. The puzzle was introduced in Japan by Nikoli in the paper Monthly Nikolist in April 1984 as Suuji wa dokushin ni kagiru (????????), which can be translated as "the numbers must be single" or "the numbers must occur only once" (?? literally means "single; celibate; unmarried"). The puzzle was named by Kaji Maki (?? ??), the president of Nikoli. At a later date, the name was abbreviated to sudoku (??, pronounced SUE-dough-coo; su = number, doku = single); it is a common practice in Japanese to take only the first kanji of compound words to form a shorter version. In 1986, Nikoli introduced two innovations which guaranteed the popularity of the puzzle: the number of givens was restricted to no more than 32 and puzzles became "symmetrical" (meaning the givens were distributed in rotationally symmetric cells). It is now published in mainstream Japanese periodicals, such as the Asahi Shimbun. Within Japan, Nikoli still holds the trademark for the name sudoku; other publications in Japan use alternative names. Although the 9×9 grid with 3×3 regions is by far the most common, numerous variations abound: sample puzzles can be 4×4 grids with 2×2 regions; 5×5 grids with pentomino regions have been published under the name Logi-5; the World Puzzle Championship has previously featured a 6×6 grid with 2×3 regions and a 7×7 grid with six heptomino regions and a disjoint region; Daily sudoku features new 4×4, 6×6, and simpler 9×9 grids every day as Daily sudoku for Kids. [1] Even the 9×9 grid is not always standard, with Ebb regularly publishing some of those with nonomino regions (also known as a jigsaw variation); the 2005 U.S. Puzzle Championship had a sudoku with parallelogram regions that wrapped around the outer border of the puzzle, as if the grid were toroidal. Larger grids are also possible, with Daily sudoku's 12×12-grid Monster sudoku [2], the Times likewise offers a 12×12-grid Dodeka sudoku with 12 regions each being 4×3, Dell regularly publishing 16×16 Number Place Challenger puzzles (the 16×16 variant often uses 1 through G rather than the 0 through F used in hexadecimal), and Nikoli proffering 25×25 sudoku the Giant behemoths. The puzzle was designed anonymously by Howard Garns, a 74-year-old retired architect and freelance puzzle constructor, and first published in 1979.[14] Although likely inspired by the Latin square invention of Leonhard Euler, Garns added a third dimension (the regional restriction) to the mathematical construct and (unlike Euler) presented the creation as a puzzle, providing a partially-completed grid and requiring the solver to fill in the rest. The puzzle was first published in New York by the specialist puzzle publisher Dell Magazines in its magazine Dell Pencil Puzzles and Word Games, under the title Number Place (which we can only assume Garns named it).

In Japanese, the word is pronounced [s??dok?]; in English, it is usually spoken with an Anglicised pronunciation, [s?'d??ku?] (BrE) [s?'do?ku?] (AmE) or ['su?d??ku] (BrE) ['su?do?ku] (AmE) (See IPA, International Phonetic Alphabet for notation usage.) An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. Computer solvers can estimate the difficulty for a human to find the solution, based on the complexity of the solving techniques required. This estimation allows publishers to tailor their sudoku puzzles to audiences of varied solving experience. Some online versions offer several difficulty levels. Other Japanese publishers refer to the puzzle as Number Place, the original U.S. title, or as "Nanpure" for short. Some non-Japanese publishers spell the title as "Su Doku". In Japanese, the word is pronounced [s??dok?]; in English, it is usually spoken with an Anglicised pronunciation, [s?'d??ku?] (BrE) [s?'do?ku?] (AmE) or ['su?d??ku] (BrE) ['su?do?ku] (AmE) (See IPA, International Phonetic Alphabet for notation usage.) Although for standard sudoku problems highly optimized and sophisticated backtracking programs are fastest, another popular way of solving such constraint problems is Donald Knuth's Dancing Links Algorithm for solving the exact matrix cover problem, of which the sudoku problems are a special case. Knuth's algorithm can be applied by converting the sudoku puzzle to a matrix cover problem, solve this problem instead, and convert the solution obtained back to a completed sudoku grid. This method is now preferred by many sudoku programmers, by virtue of its execution speed, simplicity and ease of implementation and the availability of documentation and reference source code. The two main approaches to analysis are "candidate elimination" and "what-if". When using marking, additional analysis can be performed. For example, if a digit appears only one time in the mark-ups written inside one region, then it is clear that the digit should be there, even if the cell has other digits marked as well. When using marking, a couple of similar rules applied in a specified order can solve any sudoku puzzle, without performing any kind of backtracking. There is no doubt that it was not until the British Daily Telegraph introduced the puzzle on a daily basis on 23 February 2005 with the full front-page treatment advertising the fact, that the other UK national newspapers began to take real interest. The Telegraph continued to splash the puzzle on its front page, realizing that it was gaining sales simply by its presence. Until then the Times had kept very quiet about the huge daily interest that its daily sudoku competition had aroused. That newspaper already had plans for taking advantage of their market lead, and a first sudoku book was already on the stocks before any other national UK papers had realised just how popular sudoku might be.