fun sudoku sudoku pocket pc online puzzle sudoku classic puzzle sudoku play sudoku play sudoku

Each numeral in the solution therefore occurs only once in each of three "directions" or "scopes", hence the "single numbers" implied by the puzzle's name. Challenge Me, LLC will be hosting the first national face-to-face sudoku competition in the United States and the largest sudoku tournament to date. Scheduled to begin in Chicago, Illinois on June 10-11, 2006 participants from 32 regional tournaments will compete to become the champion of their region. The Regional Champions will then compete in a National Final to become the 2006 sudoku Champions winner and win a $50,000 grand prize (http://www.sudokuchampions.com). Other Japanese publishers refer to the puzzle as Number Place, the original U.S. title, or as "Nanpure" for short. Some non-Japanese publishers spell the title as "Su Doku". In "candidate elimination", progress is made by successively eliminating candidate numerals from one or more cells to leave just one choice. After each answer has been achieved, another scan may be performed—usually checking to see the effect of the contingencies. A three-dimensional sudoku puzzle was invented by Dion Church and published in the Daily Telegraph in May 2005. The first world championship was held in Lucca, Italy from 10 to 12 March 2006 [20]; it was won by Jana Tylova, a 31-year-old accountant from the Czech Republic. The competition included variants; a full list can be found in the PDF here. This is a column, 9 cells tall. A filled-in column must have one of each digit. That means that each digit appears only once in the column. There are 9 columns in the grid, and the same applies to each of them. The first principle is based on cells where only matched numerals appear. The second is based on numerals that appear only in matched cells. The validity of either principle is demonstrated by posing the question, 'Would entering the eliminated numeral prevent completion of the other necessary placements?' If the answer to the question is 'Yes,' then the candidate numeral in question can be eliminated. Advanced techniques carry these concepts further to include multiple rows, columns, and regions.

In 1989, Loadstar/Softdisk Publishing published DigitHunt on the Commodore 64, which was apparently the first home computer version of sudoku. At least one publisher still uses that title. Even though most solving algorithms are able to solve puzzles in under a second, very fast solvers are preferred for trial-and-error puzzle-creation algorithms, which must be able to test large numbers of partial problems for validity in a short time. Other Japanese publishers refer to the puzzle as Number Place, the original U.S. title, or as "Nanpure" for short. Some non-Japanese publishers spell the title as "Su Doku". Other kinds of extra restrictions can be arithmetical in nature, such as requiring the numbers in delineated segments of the grid to have specific sums or products (an example of the former being Killer Su Doku in The Times), demarcating all places arithmetically adjacent digits appear orthogonally adjacent in the grid, providing the parity of all cells, requiring the Lo Shu Square to appear in the solution, and so on. Some such variants forsake standard givens entirely. Others like Magic sudoku [5] adds some restrictions (diagonals from 1 to 9, and colors) to the standard sudoku to solve it with less numbers. It is commonly believed that Dell Number Place puzzles are computer-generated; they typically have over 30 givens placed in an apparently random scatter, some of which can possibly be deduced from other givens. They also have no authoring credits — that is, the name of the constructor is not printed with any puzzle. Wei-Hwa Huang claims that he was commissioned by Dell to write a Number Place puzzle generator in the winter of 2000; prior to that, he was told, the puzzles were hand-made. The puzzle generator was written with Visual C++, and although it had options to generate a more Japanese-style puzzle, with symmetry constraints and fewer numbers, Dell opted not to use those features, at least not until their recent publication of sudoku-only magazines. A valid sudoku solution grid is also a Latin square. There are significantly fewer valid sudoku solution grids than Latin squares because sudoku imposes the additional regional constraint. Nonetheless, the number of valid sudoku solution grids for the standard 9×9 grid was calculated by Bertram Felgenhauer in 2005 to be 6,670,903,752,021,072,936,960 [10] (sequence A107739 in OEIS). This number is equal to 9! × 722 × 27 × 27,704,267,971, the last factor of which is prime. The result was derived through logic and brute force computation. The derivation of this result was considerably simplified by analysis provided by Frazer Jarvis and the figure has been confirmed independently by Ed Russell. Russell and Jarvis also showed that when symmetries were taken into account, there were 5,472,730,538 solutions [11] (sequence A109741 in OEIS). The number of valid sudoku solution grids for the 16×16 derivation is not known. Alphabetical variations have also emerged; there is no functional difference in the puzzle unless the letters spell something. Some variants, such as in the TV Guide, include a word reading along a main diagonal, row, or column once solved; determining the word in advance can be viewed as a solving aid. The Code Doku [7] devised by Steve Schaefer has an entire sentence embedded into the puzzle; the Super Wordoku [8] from Top Notch embeds two 9-letter words, one on each diagonal. It is debatable whether these are true sudoku puzzles: although they purportedly have a single linguistically valid solution, they cannot necessarily be solved entirely by logic, requiring the solver to determine the embedded words. Top Notch claim this as a feature designed to defeat solving programs. An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. It is commonly believed that Dell Number Place puzzles are computer-generated; they typically have over 30 givens placed in an apparently random scatter, some of which can possibly be deduced from other givens. They also have no authoring credits — that is, the name of the constructor is not printed with any puzzle. Wei-Hwa Huang claims that he was commissioned by Dell to write a Number Place puzzle generator in the winter of 2000; prior to that, he was told, the puzzles were hand-made. The puzzle generator was written with Visual C++, and although it had options to generate a more Japanese-style puzzle, with symmetry constraints and fewer numbers, Dell opted not to use those features, at least not until their recent publication of sudoku-only magazines.

sudoku puzzle game and solver by MuddyFunksters

Solving sudoku puzzles (as well as any other NP-hard problem) can be expressed as a graph colouring problem. The aim of the puzzle in its standard form is to construct a proper 9-colouring of a particular graph, given a partial 9-colouring. The graph in question has 81 vertices, one vertex for each cell of the grid. The vertices can be labelled with the ordered pairs , where x and y are integers between 1 and 9. In this case, two distinct vertices labelled by and are joined by an edge if and only if:or, or, and The name sudoku is the Japanese abbreviation of a longer phrase, "suuji wa dokushin ni kagiru (????????)," meaning "the digits must remain single"; it is a trademark of puzzle publisher Nikoli Co. Ltd in Japan. Completing the puzzle requires patience and logical ability. Although first published in a U.S. puzzle magazine in 1979, sudoku initially caught on in Japan in 1986 and attained international popularity in 2005. Other kinds of extra restrictions can be arithmetical in nature, such as requiring the numbers in delineated segments of the grid to have specific sums or products (an example of the former being Killer Su Doku in The Times), demarcating all places arithmetically adjacent digits appear orthogonally adjacent in the grid, providing the parity of all cells, requiring the Lo Shu Square to appear in the solution, and so on. Some such variants forsake standard givens entirely. Others like Magic sudoku [5] adds some restrictions (diagonals from 1 to 9, and colors) to the standard sudoku to solve it with less numbers. Ideally one needs to find a combination of techniques which avoids some of the drawbacks of the above elements. The counting of regions, rows, and columns can feel boring. Writing candidate numerals into empty cells can be time-consuming. The what-if approach can be confusing unless you are well organised. The proverbial Holy Grail is to find a technique which minimizes counting, marking up, and rubbing out.

The puzzle was designed anonymously by Howard Garns, a 74-year-old retired architect and freelance puzzle constructor, and first published in 1979.[14] Although likely inspired by the Latin square invention of Leonhard Euler, Garns added a third dimension (the regional restriction) to the mathematical construct and (unlike Euler) presented the creation as a puzzle, providing a partially-completed grid and requiring the solver to fill in the rest. The puzzle was first published in New York by the specialist puzzle publisher Dell Magazines in its magazine Dell Pencil Puzzles and Word Games, under the title Number Place (which we can only assume Garns named it). The United States sudoku Association Inc. [21] is another corporation hosting tournaments across the United States. Currently, they are sponsoring a tournament for charity for the American Legion. Their website also includes a forum. Building a sudoku puzzle by hand can be performed efficiently by pre-determining the locations of the givens and assigning them values only as needed to make deductive progress. Such an undefined given can be assumed to not hold any particular value as long as it is given a different value before construction is completed; the solver will be able to make the same deductions stemming from such assumptions, as at that point the given is very much defined as something else. This technique gives the constructor greater control over the flow of puzzle solving, leading the solver along the same path the compiler used in building the puzzle. (This technique is adaptable to composing puzzles other than sudoku as well.) Great caution is required, however, as failing to recognize where a number can be logically deduced at any point in construction—regardless of how tortuous that logic may be—can result in an unsolvable puzzle when defining a future given contradicts what has already been built. Building a sudoku with symmetrical givens is a simple matter of placing the undefined givens in a symmetrical pattern to begin with. Nikoli sudoku are hand-constructed, with the author being credited; the givens are always found in a symmetrical pattern. Dell Number Place Challenger (see Variants below) puzzles also list authors. The sudoku puzzles printed in most UK newspapers are apparently computer-generated but employ symmetrical givens; The Guardian licenses and publishes Nikoli-constructed sudoku puzzles, though it does not include credits. The Guardian famously claimed that because they were hand-constructed, their puzzles would contain "imperceptible witticisms" that would be very unlikely in computer-generated sudoku. The challenge to sudoku programmers is teaching a program how to build clever puzzles, such that they may be indistinguishable from those constructed by humans; Wayne Gould required six years of tweaking his popular program before he believed he achieved that level. Computer solvers can estimate the difficulty for a human to find the solution, based on the complexity of the solving techniques required. This estimation allows publishers to tailor their sudoku puzzles to audiences of varied solving experience. Some online versions offer several difficulty levels. There is no doubt that it was not until the British Daily Telegraph introduced the puzzle on a daily basis on 23 February 2005 with the full front-page treatment advertising the fact, that the other UK national newspapers began to take real interest. The Telegraph continued to splash the puzzle on its front page, realizing that it was gaining sales simply by its presence. Until then the Times had kept very quiet about the huge daily interest that its daily sudoku competition had aroused. That newspaper already had plans for taking advantage of their market lead, and a first sudoku book was already on the stocks before any other national UK papers had realised just how popular sudoku might be. The digits to be entered are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. The strategy for solving a puzzle may be regarded as comprising a combination of three processes: scanning, marking up, and analysing. Computer solvers can estimate the difficulty for a human to find the solution, based on the complexity of the solving techniques required. This estimation allows publishers to tailor their sudoku puzzles to audiences of varied solving experience. Some online versions offer several difficulty levels.