easy printable puzzle sudoku miniclip sudoku blank grid sudoku electronic game sudoku krazydad puzzle sudoku easy free printable puzzle sudoku

Within the context of puzzle history, parallels are often cited to Rubik's Cube, another logic puzzle popular in the 1980s. sudoku has been called the "Rubik's cube of the 21st century Other Japanese publishers refer to the puzzle as Number Place, the original U.S. title, or as "Nanpure" for short. Some non-Japanese publishers spell the title as "Su Doku". There is no doubt that it was not until the British Daily Telegraph introduced the puzzle on a daily basis on 23 February 2005 with the full front-page treatment advertising the fact, that the other UK national newspapers began to take real interest. The Telegraph continued to splash the puzzle on its front page, realizing that it was gaining sales simply by its presence. Until then the Times had kept very quiet about the huge daily interest that its daily sudoku competition had aroused. That newspaper already had plans for taking advantage of their market lead, and a first sudoku book was already on the stocks before any other national UK papers had realised just how popular sudoku might be. sudoku (Japanese) also known as Number Place, is a logic-based placement puzzle. The aim of the puzzle is to enter a numerical digit from 1 through 9 in each cell of a 9×9 grid made up of 3×3 subgrids (called "regions"), starting with various digits given in some cells (the "givens"). Each row, column, and region must contain only one instance of each numeral. This is a row, 9 cells wide. A filled-in row must have one of each digit. That means that each digit appears only once in the row. There are 9 rows in the grid, and the same applies to each of them. A valid sudoku solution grid is also a Latin square. There are significantly fewer valid sudoku solution grids than Latin squares because sudoku imposes the additional regional constraint. Nonetheless, the number of valid sudoku solution grids for the standard 9×9 grid was calculated by Bertram Felgenhauer in 2005 to be 6,670,903,752,021,072,936,960 [10] (sequence A107739 in OEIS). This number is equal to 9! × 722 × 27 × 27,704,267,971, the last factor of which is prime. The result was derived through logic and brute force computation. The derivation of this result was considerably simplified by analysis provided by Frazer Jarvis and the figure has been confirmed independently by Ed Russell. Russell and Jarvis also showed that when symmetries were taken into account, there were 5,472,730,538 solutions [11] (sequence A109741 in OEIS). The number of valid sudoku solution grids for the 16×16 derivation is not known. Ideally one needs to find a combination of techniques which avoids some of the drawbacks of the above elements. The counting of regions, rows, and columns can feel boring. Writing candidate numerals into empty cells can be time-consuming. The what-if approach can be confusing unless you are well organised. The proverbial Holy Grail is to find a technique which minimizes counting, marking up, and rubbing out. This principle also works with candidate numeral subsets, that is, if three cells have candidates (p,q,r), (p,q), and (q,r) or even just (p,r), (q,r), and (p,q), all of the set (p,q,r) elsewhere within that same scope can be deleted. The principle is true for all quantities of candidate numerals. It is commonly believed that Dell Number Place puzzles are computer-generated; they typically have over 30 givens placed in an apparently random scatter, some of which can possibly be deduced from other givens. They also have no authoring credits — that is, the name of the constructor is not printed with any puzzle. Wei-Hwa Huang claims that he was commissioned by Dell to write a Number Place puzzle generator in the winter of 2000; prior to that, he was told, the puzzles were hand-made. The puzzle generator was written with Visual C++, and although it had options to generate a more Japanese-style puzzle, with symmetry constraints and fewer numbers, Dell opted not to use those features, at least not until their recent publication of sudoku-only magazines.

Yoshimitsu Kanai published his computerized puzzle generator under the name Single Number for the Apple Macintosh [15] in 1995 in Japanese and English, for the Palm (PDA) [16] in 1996, and for the Mac OS-X [17] in 2005. Wei-Hwa Huang created a meta-sudoku, where the object is to finish drawing the 5×5 grid's pentomino-region borders so as to leave a uniquely solvable puzzle with no identically-shaped regions. Fill in the grid so that every row, every column, and every 3x3 box contains the digits 1 through 9. In Japanese, the word is pronounced [s??dok?]; in English, it is usually spoken with an Anglicised pronunciation, [s?'d??ku?] (BrE) [s?'do?ku?] (AmE) or ['su?d??ku] (BrE) ['su?do?ku] (AmE) (See IPA, International Phonetic Alphabet for notation usage.) This is a box, containing 9 cells in a 3x3 layout. A filled-in box must have one of each digit. That means that each digit appears only once in the box. There are 9 boxes in the grid, and the same applies to each of them. Most publications sort their sudoku puzzles into four rating levels, although the actual cut-off points of the levels and indeed the names of the levels themselves can vary widely. Typically, however, the titles are some set of synonyms of "easy", "intermediate", "hard", and "challenging". An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. Puzzles constructed from multiple sudoku grids are common. Five 9×9 grids which overlap at the corner regions in the shape of a quincunx is known in Japan as Gattai 5 (five merged) sudoku. In The Times and The Sydney Morning Herald this form of puzzle is known as Samurai sudoku. [6] Puzzles with twenty or more overlapping grids are not uncommon in some Japanese publications. Often, no givens are to be found in overlapping regions. Sequential grids, as opposed to overlapping, are also published, with values in specific locations in grids needing to be transferred to others.

sudoku puzzle game and solver by MuddyFunksters

The strategy for solving a puzzle may be regarded as comprising a combination of three processes: scanning, marking up, and analysing. Michael Metcalf reportedly created a 100×100 sudoku puzzle, published to the "sudokuworld" Yahoo! group. Within the context of puzzle history, parallels are often cited to Rubik's Cube, another logic puzzle popular in the 1980s. sudoku has been called the "Rubik's cube of the 21st century Even though most solving algorithms are able to solve puzzles in under a second, very fast solvers are preferred for trial-and-error puzzle-creation algorithms, which must be able to test large numbers of partial problems for validity in a short time. Nikoli sudoku are hand-constructed, with the author being credited; the givens are always found in a symmetrical pattern. Dell Number Place Challenger (see Variants below) puzzles also list authors. The sudoku puzzles printed in most UK newspapers are apparently computer-generated but employ symmetrical givens; The Guardian licenses and publishes Nikoli-constructed sudoku puzzles, though it does not include credits. The Guardian famously claimed that because they were hand-constructed, their puzzles would contain "imperceptible witticisms" that would be very unlikely in computer-generated sudoku. The challenge to sudoku programmers is teaching a program how to build clever puzzles, such that they may be indistinguishable from those constructed by humans; Wayne Gould required six years of tweaking his popular program before he believed he achieved that level. The general problem of solving sudoku puzzles on n2 x n2 boards of n x n blocks is known to be NP-complete [9]. This gives some indication of why sudoku is difficult to solve, although on boards of finite size the problem is finite and can be solved by a deterministic finite automaton that knows the entire game tree.

The two main approaches to analysis are "candidate elimination" and "what-if". Three days later The Daily Mail began to publish the puzzle under the name "Codenumber". The Daily Telegraph introduced its first sudoku by its puzzle compiler Michael Mepham on 19 January 2005 and other Telegraph Group newspapers took it up very quickly. Nationwide News Pty Ltd began publishing the puzzle in The Daily Telegraph of Sydney on 20 May 2005; five puzzles with solutions were printed that day. The immense surge in popularity of sudoku in British newspapers and internationally has led to it being dubbed in the world media in 2005 the "fastest growing puzzle in the world". Wei-Hwa Huang created a meta-sudoku, where the object is to finish drawing the 5×5 grid's pentomino-region borders so as to leave a uniquely solvable puzzle with no identically-shaped regions. Computer solvers can estimate the difficulty for a human to find the solution, based on the complexity of the solving techniques required. This estimation allows publishers to tailor their sudoku puzzles to audiences of varied solving experience. Some online versions offer several difficulty levels. Another alternative uses finite domain constraint programming. A constraint program specifies the constraints of the puzzle (the fact that every number in each row, each column, and each 3×3 region must be unique, and the provided "givens"); a finite domain solver applies the constraints successively to narrow down the solution space until a solution is found. Backtracking may be applied when alternate values cannot otherwise be excluded. A second related principle is also true. If, within any set of cells (row, column or region), a set of candidate numerals can only appear within a number of cells equal to the quantity of candidate numerals, the cells and numerals are matched and only those numerals can appear in the matched cells. Other candidates in the matched cells can be eliminated. For example, if the 2 numerals (p,q) can only appear in 2 cells within a specific set of cells (row, column or region), all other candidates in those 2 cells can be eliminated. The puzzle is most frequently a 9×9 grid, made up of 3×3 subgrids called "regions" (other terms include "boxes", "blocks", and the like when referring to the standard variation; even "quadrants" is sometimes used, despite this being an inaccurate term for a 9×9 grid). Cross-hatching: the scanning of rows (or columns) to identify which line in a particular region may contain a certain numeral by a process of elimination. This process is then repeated with the columns (or rows). For fastest results, the numerals are scanned in order of their frequency. It is important to perform this process systematically, checking all of the digits 1-9. An alternative technique, that some find easier, is to "mark up" those numerals that a cell cannot be. Thus a cell will start empty and as more constraints become known it will slowly fill. When only one mark is missing, that has to be the value of the cell. One advantage to this method of marking is that, assuming no mistakes are made and the marks can be overwritten with the value of a cell, there is no longer a need for any erasures. It is also fairly simple to build a backtracking search. Typically this involves assigning a value (say, 1, or the nearest available number to 1) to the first available cell (say, the top left hand corner) and then moves on to assign the next available value (say, 2) to the next available cell. This continues until a conflict occurs, in which case the next alternative value is used for the last cell changed. If a cell cannot be filled, the program backs up one level (from that cell) and tries the next value at the higher level (hence the name backtracking). Although far from computationally efficient, this "brute force" method will find a solution, given sufficient computation time (even a fairly naive implementation will typically not take a noticeable amount of time). A more efficient program could keep track of potential values for cells, eliminating impossible values until only one value remains for a cell, then filling that cell in and using that information for more eliminations, and so on until the puzzle is solved.