palm sudoku puzzle sudoku tip line puzzle sudoku sudoku puzzle download puzzle sudoku grille sudoku

Within the context of puzzle history, parallels are often cited to Rubik's Cube, another logic puzzle popular in the 1980s. sudoku has been called the "Rubik's cube of the 21st century Dr. House was clearly seen working on a sudoku puzzle on his office computer in one scene of the December 13, 2005 episode of House, M. D.; sudoku is supposedly now banned on the studio set due to the cast constantly playing it. A valid sudoku solution grid is also a Latin square. There are significantly fewer valid sudoku solution grids than Latin squares because sudoku imposes the additional regional constraint. Nonetheless, the number of valid sudoku solution grids for the standard 9×9 grid was calculated by Bertram Felgenhauer in 2005 to be 6,670,903,752,021,072,936,960 [10] (sequence A107739 in OEIS). This number is equal to 9! × 722 × 27 × 27,704,267,971, the last factor of which is prime. The result was derived through logic and brute force computation. The derivation of this result was considerably simplified by analysis provided by Frazer Jarvis and the figure has been confirmed independently by Ed Russell. Russell and Jarvis also showed that when symmetries were taken into account, there were 5,472,730,538 solutions [11] (sequence A109741 in OEIS). The number of valid sudoku solution grids for the 16×16 derivation is not known. A valid sudoku solution grid is also a Latin square. There are significantly fewer valid sudoku solution grids than Latin squares because sudoku imposes the additional regional constraint. Nonetheless, the number of valid sudoku solution grids for the standard 9×9 grid was calculated by Bertram Felgenhauer in 2005 to be 6,670,903,752,021,072,936,960 [10] (sequence A107739 in OEIS). This number is equal to 9! × 722 × 27 × 27,704,267,971, the last factor of which is prime. The result was derived through logic and brute force computation. The derivation of this result was considerably simplified by analysis provided by Frazer Jarvis and the figure has been confirmed independently by Ed Russell. Russell and Jarvis also showed that when symmetries were taken into account, there were 5,472,730,538 solutions [11] (sequence A109741 in OEIS). The number of valid sudoku solution grids for the 16×16 derivation is not known. In 1989, Loadstar/Softdisk Publishing published DigitHunt on the Commodore 64, which was apparently the first home computer version of sudoku. At least one publisher still uses that title. Yoshimitsu Kanai published his computerized puzzle generator under the name Single Number for the Apple Macintosh [15] in 1995 in Japanese and English, for the Palm (PDA) [16] in 1996, and for the Mac OS-X [17] in 2005. The rapid rise of sudoku from relative obscurity in Britain to a front-page feature in national newspapers attracted commentary in the media (see References below) and parody (such as when The Guardian's G2 section advertised itself as the first newspaper supplement with a sudoku grid on every page [18]). sudoku became particularly prominent in newspapers soon after the 2005 general election leading some commentators to suggest that it was filling the gaps previously occupied by election coverage. A simpler explanation is that the puzzle attracts and retains readers—sudoku players report an increasing sense of satisfaction as a puzzle approaches completion. Recognizing the different psychological appeals of easy and difficult puzzles The Times introduced both side by side on 20 June 2005. From July 2005 Channel 4 included a daily sudoku game in their Teletext service (at page 391). On 2 August 2005 the BBC's programme guide Radio Times started to feature a weekly Super sudoku. The Dutch company Mobile Excellence International developed together with their Vietnamese partner the first mobile i-mode sudoku game. The game was launched throughout Europe in September 2005. [19] The maximum number of givens that can be provided while still not rendering the solution unique is four short of a full grid; if two instances of two numbers each are missing and the cells they are to occupy form the corners of an orthogonal rectangle, and exactly two of these cells are within one region, there are two ways the numbers can be assigned. Since this applies to Latin squares in general, most variants of sudoku have the same maximum. The inverse problem—the fewest givens that render a solution unique—is unsolved, although the lowest number yet found for the standard variation without a symmetry constraint is 17, a number of which have been found by Japanese puzzle enthusiasts [12] [13], and 18 with the givens in rotationally symmetric cells. A valid sudoku solution grid is also a Latin square. There are significantly fewer valid sudoku solution grids than Latin squares because sudoku imposes the additional regional constraint. Nonetheless, the number of valid sudoku solution grids for the standard 9×9 grid was calculated by Bertram Felgenhauer in 2005 to be 6,670,903,752,021,072,936,960 [10] (sequence A107739 in OEIS). This number is equal to 9! × 722 × 27 × 27,704,267,971, the last factor of which is prime. The result was derived through logic and brute force computation. The derivation of this result was considerably simplified by analysis provided by Frazer Jarvis and the figure has been confirmed independently by Ed Russell. Russell and Jarvis also showed that when symmetries were taken into account, there were 5,472,730,538 solutions [11] (sequence A109741 in OEIS). The number of valid sudoku solution grids for the 16×16 derivation is not known.

A valid sudoku solution grid is also a Latin square. There are significantly fewer valid sudoku solution grids than Latin squares because sudoku imposes the additional regional constraint. Nonetheless, the number of valid sudoku solution grids for the standard 9×9 grid was calculated by Bertram Felgenhauer in 2005 to be 6,670,903,752,021,072,936,960 [10] (sequence A107739 in OEIS). This number is equal to 9! × 722 × 27 × 27,704,267,971, the last factor of which is prime. The result was derived through logic and brute force computation. The derivation of this result was considerably simplified by analysis provided by Frazer Jarvis and the figure has been confirmed independently by Ed Russell. Russell and Jarvis also showed that when symmetries were taken into account, there were 5,472,730,538 solutions [11] (sequence A109741 in OEIS). The number of valid sudoku solution grids for the 16×16 derivation is not known. Another alternative uses finite domain constraint programming. A constraint program specifies the constraints of the puzzle (the fact that every number in each row, each column, and each 3×3 region must be unique, and the provided "givens"); a finite domain solver applies the constraints successively to narrow down the solution space until a solution is found. Backtracking may be applied when alternate values cannot otherwise be excluded. The puzzle is most frequently a 9×9 grid, made up of 3×3 subgrids called "regions" (other terms include "boxes", "blocks", and the like when referring to the standard variation; even "quadrants" is sometimes used, despite this being an inaccurate term for a 9×9 grid). By April and May 2005 the puzzle had become popular in these publications and it was rapidly introduced to several other national British newspapers including The Independent, The Guardian, The Sun (where it was labelled Sun Doku), and The Daily Mirror. As the name sudoku became well-known in Britain, the Daily Mail adopted it in place of its earlier name "Codenumber". Newspapers competed to promote their sudoku puzzles, with The Times and the Daily Mail each claiming to have been the first to feature sudoku. United States broadcaster CBS has run several stories concerning sudoku, including on the Early Show in summer 2005, and on the CBS Evening News that autumn, on October 26. There is no doubt that it was not until the British Daily Telegraph introduced the puzzle on a daily basis on 23 February 2005 with the full front-page treatment advertising the fact, that the other UK national newspapers began to take real interest. The Telegraph continued to splash the puzzle on its front page, realizing that it was gaining sales simply by its presence. Until then the Times had kept very quiet about the huge daily interest that its daily sudoku competition had aroused. That newspaper already had plans for taking advantage of their market lead, and a first sudoku book was already on the stocks before any other national UK papers had realised just how popular sudoku might be.

sudoku puzzle game and solver by MuddyFunksters

The world's first live TV sudoku show, 1 July 2005, Sky One.As a one-off, the world's first live TV sudoku show, sudoku Live, was broadcast on 1 July 2005 on Sky One. It was presented by Carol Vorderman. Nine teams of nine players (with one celebrity in each team) representing geographical regions competed to solve a puzzle. Each player had a hand-held device for entering numbers corresponding to answers for four cells. Conferring was permitted although the lack of acquaintance of the players with each other inhibited an analytical discussion. The audience at home was in a separate interactive competition. A Sky One publicity stunt to promote the programme with the world's largest sudoku puzzle went awry when the 275 foot (84 m) square puzzle was found to have 1,905 correct solutions. The puzzle was carved into a hillside in Chipping Sodbury, near Bristol, England, in view of the M4 motorway. The stunt was cleverly timed to coincide with a major road expansion, where an imposed 40 mph speed restriction allowed drivers to safely view the puzzle whilst driving. The 2005 U.S. Puzzle Championship includes a variant called Digital Number Place: rather than givens, most cells contain a partial given—a segment of a number, with the numbers drawn as if part of a seven-segment display. It is also fairly simple to build a backtracking search. Typically this involves assigning a value (say, 1, or the nearest available number to 1) to the first available cell (say, the top left hand corner) and then moves on to assign the next available value (say, 2) to the next available cell. This continues until a conflict occurs, in which case the next alternative value is used for the last cell changed. If a cell cannot be filled, the program backs up one level (from that cell) and tries the next value at the higher level (hence the name backtracking). Although far from computationally efficient, this "brute force" method will find a solution, given sufficient computation time (even a fairly naive implementation will typically not take a noticeable amount of time). A more efficient program could keep track of potential values for cells, eliminating impossible values until only one value remains for a cell, then filling that cell in and using that information for more eliminations, and so on until the puzzle is solved. Every puzzle has just one correct solution. It is also fairly simple to build a backtracking search. Typically this involves assigning a value (say, 1, or the nearest available number to 1) to the first available cell (say, the top left hand corner) and then moves on to assign the next available value (say, 2) to the next available cell. This continues until a conflict occurs, in which case the next alternative value is used for the last cell changed. If a cell cannot be filled, the program backs up one level (from that cell) and tries the next value at the higher level (hence the name backtracking). Although far from computationally efficient, this "brute force" method will find a solution, given sufficient computation time (even a fairly naive implementation will typically not take a noticeable amount of time). A more efficient program could keep track of potential values for cells, eliminating impossible values until only one value remains for a cell, then filling that cell in and using that information for more eliminations, and so on until the puzzle is solved. Computer solvers can estimate the difficulty for a human to find the solution, based on the complexity of the solving techniques required. This estimation allows publishers to tailor their sudoku puzzles to audiences of varied solving experience. Some online versions offer several difficulty levels. United States broadcaster CBS has run several stories concerning sudoku, including on the Early Show in summer 2005, and on the CBS Evening News that autumn, on October 26. For most computer programmers, coding the search for cell values based on elimination, contingencies and multiple contingencies (required for harder sudoku) is relatively straightforward. These programs emulate the human logic to solve a puzzle without resorting to guesses. Given the self-imposed constraints of most sudoku publishers, this method generally succeeds.

The maximum number of givens that can be provided while still not rendering the solution unique is four short of a full grid; if two instances of two numbers each are missing and the cells they are to occupy form the corners of an orthogonal rectangle, and exactly two of these cells are within one region, there are two ways the numbers can be assigned. Since this applies to Latin squares in general, most variants of sudoku have the same maximum. The inverse problem—the fewest givens that render a solution unique—is unsolved, although the lowest number yet found for the standard variation without a symmetry constraint is 17, a number of which have been found by Japanese puzzle enthusiasts [12] [13], and 18 with the givens in rotationally symmetric cells. The two main approaches to analysis are "candidate elimination" and "what-if". Puzzles constructed from multiple sudoku grids are common. Five 9×9 grids which overlap at the corner regions in the shape of a quincunx is known in Japan as Gattai 5 (five merged) sudoku. In The Times and The Sydney Morning Herald this form of puzzle is known as Samurai sudoku. [6] Puzzles with twenty or more overlapping grids are not uncommon in some Japanese publications. Often, no givens are to be found in overlapping regions. Sequential grids, as opposed to overlapping, are also published, with values in specific locations in grids needing to be transferred to others. Each numeral in the solution therefore occurs only once in each of three "directions" or "scopes", hence the "single numbers" implied by the puzzle's name. This is a row, 9 cells wide. A filled-in row must have one of each digit. That means that each digit appears only once in the row. There are 9 rows in the grid, and the same applies to each of them. Alphabetical variations have also emerged; there is no functional difference in the puzzle unless the letters spell something. Some variants, such as in the TV Guide, include a word reading along a main diagonal, row, or column once solved; determining the word in advance can be viewed as a solving aid. The Code Doku [7] devised by Steve Schaefer has an entire sentence embedded into the puzzle; the Super Wordoku [8] from Top Notch embeds two 9-letter words, one on each diagonal. It is debatable whether these are true sudoku puzzles: although they purportedly have a single linguistically valid solution, they cannot necessarily be solved entirely by logic, requiring the solver to determine the embedded words. Top Notch claim this as a feature designed to defeat solving programs. Other Japanese publishers refer to the puzzle as Number Place, the original U.S. title, or as "Nanpure" for short. Some non-Japanese publishers spell the title as "Su Doku". Other kinds of extra restrictions can be arithmetical in nature, such as requiring the numbers in delineated segments of the grid to have specific sums or products (an example of the former being Killer Su Doku in The Times), demarcating all places arithmetically adjacent digits appear orthogonally adjacent in the grid, providing the parity of all cells, requiring the Lo Shu Square to appear in the solution, and so on. Some such variants forsake standard givens entirely. Others like Magic sudoku [5] adds some restrictions (diagonals from 1 to 9, and colors) to the standard sudoku to solve it with less numbers.